Skip to content
Fund My LoRAhome
Apply

For someone deciding whether to trust us

What this is, and what it is not yet

You are being asked to hand over hundreds of pictures of yourself so a model can be trained on you. That is a large ask from a project you have never heard of, and there are two questions worth more than everything else on this page.

  1. “Will someone sit and look through my photos for fun?”

    Answered in full below, including the part where the answer is not simply “no”.

  2. “Is this a real business, or somebody’s hobby?”

    It is pre-launch and nothing is taking money. The next section is the whole honest inventory, before any of the reassuring parts.

Pre-launch

Where this actually is

First, before anything reassuring. Overclaiming to someone in your position is how a project like this deserves to lose you, so here is the whole inventory — what runs, what is only written down, and what flatly does not exist.

  • The consent model, in code

    Exists and runs

    The dimensions, the per-service scoping, the training gate and the generation gate are written and tested. This page reads its values out of that code rather than describing it from memory.

  • This site, and the pages on it

    Exists and runs

    Public, unauthenticated, and no more than it appears to be: pitch pages, this page, and a walkthrough of the application flow.

  • Private storage and the ID vault

    Written down, not built

    The two-bucket separation described below is a written architecture decision that has not been provisioned. No storage account holds anyone's photos today, because nobody has uploaded any.

  • Identity verification

    Written down, not built

    The vendor is not chosen and no verification has ever been run. It cannot go live before there is a legal entity to name as records custodian.

  • Payments

    Does not exist

    No processor is attached and no card details are collected anywhere on this site. Every backing button you will see is disabled and says so.

  • A live chat persona

    Does not exist

    Messaging exists as a consent dimension you can permit or refuse. The chatbot it would govern has not been built.

  • Open applications

    Does not exist

    Applications are not open. The flow at /apply is a walkthrough that stores nothing and submits nothing — there is nothing at the end of it to sign.

  • A legal entity

    Does not exist

    There is no company yet. That single fact blocks payments, identity verification, and the §2257 records statement, and it is the honest reason this is still pre-launch.

So nothing on this page is a product demo. Everything below describes how the platform is built and what its rules already refuse to do. Where a thing is a plan rather than a running system, the section says so in the same sentence.

Two sites, one record

There are two front doors and they do different jobs. The thing that connects them is the consent record you sign — one ledger, read by both, and the only thing either of them is allowed to act on.

  • Fund My LoRA

    fundmylora.com

    Where you fund and control your model

    • You pitch in your own words, on a page built to be shared on your own social accounts — which is why the public previews here stay clothed and non-suggestive whatever else you permit.
    • Backers pay toward one thing: a professional studio shoot, so your model is built from lit, directed capture instead of a tripod and a ring light.
    • That money is production financing. It buys nobody any rights over your likeness and cannot widen your consent by a single line.

  • Loralicious

    loralicious.com

    The storefront where fans subscribe

    • Members pay for generations — one image, clip, voice line or reply at a time, made on request inside the limits you set.
    • Nobody receives your model file and nobody receives your source photos. There is no download and no export.
    • Your share of that revenue comes back to you, and it is the largest single share of it.

One ledger, not two policies. Your grant is stored once and both sites read it. Narrowing it here narrows what can be sold there, on the next request — there is no separate copy on the storefront that could fall out of date, because the storefront has no copy at all.

Each site runs its own 18+ gate. Those obligations attach per site under state law and are not inherited from a sibling domain, which is why you meet one here too.

What happens to your photos

Four stages, in order, with a hard stop in the middle. The stop matters most: it is something built to refuse, not a promise someone makes. Here is the whole path your files take, start to finish.

  1. Step 1

    Private storage

    Your photos arrive somewhere private

    They go into storage with no public address. There is no link to them, and no link can be created — not by us, not by anyone who guesses. Nothing in this stage is ever what a model learns from. These are your originals and they stay untouched.

  2. Step 2

    A working copy

    A separate working copy gets prepared

    Your originals are left alone and a copy is made to work from — cropped, labelled, and culled of anything blurry, duplicated or unusable. This copy is the only thing training is ever allowed to read, which means somebody has to sit down and make it. It cannot happen to your photos on its own.

  3. Step 3

    The permission check

    Nothing trains until your signed consent is checked

    Before a single image is read, the trainer checks for a valid, signed record from you — matched against the exact document you saw, with your age verified, and not withdrawn or replaced. If that check fails, training stops. It is not a rule someone is trusted to follow; it is a step that refuses to continue.

  4. Step 4

    Your model

    What comes out is a model, not your pictures

    One file, a few hundred megabytes, that describes your likeness. Your photographs are not inside it and cannot be recovered from it. Nobody who pays for anything ever receives a picture you took — they receive something newly generated.

And what never happens

  • Your photos are never published, never sold, never packaged, and never handed to a buyer. What someone paying receives is a generated image — never a file you sent.
  • Your photos are never mixed into anyone else's dataset, and nobody else's are mixed into yours. What your model learns from is your images and nothing else.
  • Nothing trains on a single photo before your signed consent exists. Not a test run, not a preview, not "just to see if it works".

Why keep your originals and the working copy apart? Because one folder holding both makes it possible to train on a raw upload by mistake. Keeping them separate means anything pointed at the wrong place finds nothing, and the only way your photos become trainable is for a person to deliberately prepare them — a step that can be recorded, reviewed, and refused.

Wondering whether a human actually looks at your pictures? That deserves a straight answer rather than a line here — it is answered honestly just below.

Where this stands today: the path above is a decision we have written down, not a system that is running. The storage does not exist yet, the provider is not finally chosen, and nobody has uploaded a single photo. The permission check is built and tested now; the stages it protects are still on paper. When that changes, this page changes with it.

The questions that matter

Answered without hedging, including where the answer is uncomfortable or unfinished.

Will someone sit and look through my photos for fun?

The honest answer is that a person does look at them, and it would be a lie to say otherwise. Preparing a dataset is manual work: frames get cropped, tagged, and thrown out for being blurry or duplicated. Software cannot judge which shot of you is usable. Somebody sees every picture you send.

What that person is not doing is browsing. Access is scoped to preparing your dataset and training your model, it is limited to the smallest number of people who can do that work, and it is meant to be logged — so the question stops being "do you trust the person" and becomes "is there a record of who opened what".

There is no gallery view, no shared drive, and no public link. Your files are not a browsable library anyone can wander into, and once your dataset is prepared there is no ongoing reason for anyone to open the originals again.

Are my ID documents kept in the same place as my photos?

No, and this is one of the few things treated as non-negotiable. If an ID copy is required, it goes into a separate store with different credentials from the media — encrypted at rest, write-once, no public URLs possible, and every read logged. Nothing in the media storage points at it.

It is also a separate subsystem from the age check a paying member passes, with no shared code between them. That is not tidiness: the law pulls in opposite directions. A performer's ID copy must be retained, and a viewer's must not be — most state age-verification statutes forbid keeping it. One helper reused across both is exactly how those get crossed, so there isn't one.

Today no ID has ever been captured, because that cannot begin before there is a legal entity to name as the custodian of those records.

Can anything of mine become public without me agreeing?

Nothing is public by default. Your source files have no public address at all. What appears on a pitch page is only what you have explicitly granted, and the public gallery is additionally capped at the mildest rung of the tone scale — everyday, non-suggestive, fully clothed — however broad your consent goes elsewhere.

That cap exists because this page is built to be shared on your own social accounts, and every major network forbids explicit content. Anything broader you have permitted sits behind the 18+ gate, never on a link you post.

What if I change my mind, or want out entirely?

You can narrow any part of your grant, or withdraw it, at any time. A narrower grant supersedes the old one and takes effect on the next request — not on tonight's batch job. The ledger is append-only, so what you agreed to can never be quietly rewritten behind you; a change adds a record, it does not edit one.

The part that is genuinely unresolved: what happens to media that was already generated while your consent was broader. New generations stop the moment a record is revoked, and that is enforced today. The retroactive question — recall, deletion, what a buyer already holds — has not been answered, and it is legally significant. Ask about it directly before you sign anything, and do not accept a vague answer, including from us.

What you actually control

Not one checkbox at signup. Four dials plus a short list of extras, set once as a baseline and then adjustable per surface. Every value below is read out of the same code the gate runs, in the exact words the system uses.

Face

Whether your face may appear at all. Body only means it never does — framed so it is not in the picture.

  • Body only
  • Full face

Coverage

How much is uncovered. Nothing about this is implied by anything else you pick.

  • Clothed
  • Partial nudity
  • Full nudity

Tone

How suggestive it may be, kept separate from coverage on purpose: clothed can be raunchy, and nude can be wholesome.

  • Wholesome
  • Playful
  • Naughty
  • Raunchy

Styles

The treatment. These are a set, not a ladder — anime is not less than photoreal, so each one is picked or not picked. Photoreal carries the most weight and is never assumed.

  • Photoreal
  • Editorial
  • Pin-up
  • Anime
  • Cartoon 3D

Extras — every one of these starts off

These are not part of a broad creative grant and are never bundled into one. You can permit the widest possible pictures and still refuse all three; each is its own deliberate act, and commercial use in particular is much harder to walk back than a picture is.

  • Face swap
  • Commercial use
  • Third-party licence

Set separately for each service

Images, video, voice and messaging are four decisions, not one. You set a baseline and then depart from it wherever you want — broader or narrower — and any departure is recorded as a departure rather than applied quietly.

Each surface is only asked what it actually has. A voice grant has no face, no coverage and no art style in it, so those are not asked, not displayed, and not claimed by anything you sign. Voice is a separate biometric with its own source audio and can be withdrawn on its own while everything else stands.

  • Images

    Asks 5 questions

    • Face
    • Coverage
    • Tone
    • Styles
    • Wardrobe

  • Video

    Asks 5 questions

    • Face
    • Coverage
    • Tone
    • Styles
    • Wardrobe

  • Voice

    Asks one question

    • Tone

  • Messaging

    Asks one question

    • Tone

Checked before every single generation. Not at signup, not nightly — each request is measured against your current record on the spot and refused if it asks for more than you granted. A refusal reports every dimension it failed on, and a missing or unreadable record refuses by default rather than falling through.

Narrowable and withdrawable at any time. A narrower grant supersedes the old one and takes effect on the next request. Because the check happens per request rather than once, there is no window in which an old permission is still being honoured.

Why the paperwork is the point

The fastest way to tell a real operation from a hobby in this industry is whether it has read the rules it is subject to. Here are the ones that shape everything above — what each requires, and what is actually done about it.

  • 18+, verified — not a checkbox

    What the rule requires. Age verification for viewers of adult material is mandated in roughly two dozen US states and by the UK Online Safety Act, and the Supreme Court upheld the model statute in 2025. Self-attestation is no longer a defensible posture where those laws apply.

    What is done about it. Both sites carry an age gate, and real verification is designed to run through a provider that returns a yes-or-no answer and keeps nothing. Most of those same statutes forbid retaining verification data, so a viewer's ID is never stored.

  • §2257 recordkeeping, for you

    What the rule requires. For sexually explicit depictions of real people, federal law requires the producer to hold a copy of each performer's government photo ID with legal name, date of birth and every alias used, indexed and cross-referenced, retained for seven years from production or five years after production ceases — whichever is later. Every copy of the content must carry a statement naming a records custodian at a US address.

    What is done about it. This is the mirror image of the viewer rule, which is why the two systems share no storage and no code. It is also why an ID vault exists in the design at all: retaining that copy is an obligation, not a preference. Nothing here can run before there is an entity to name as custodian, and that is why identity verification is not live.

  • Documented consent for every depicted person

    What the rule requires. Sexual or intimate content of a real, identifiable person without their explicit consent is illegal — federally under the TAKE IT DOWN Act, which also imposes a 48-hour takedown duty, and civilly under 15 U.S.C. §6851, alongside state law. Training on faces additionally puts a platform inside biometric privacy law, where explicit consent is realistically the only lawful basis.

    What is done about it. This is the reason the consent record is infrastructure rather than paperwork. Every asset has to trace to a signed record, the gate refuses without one, and the ledger is append-only so what you agreed to remains provable rather than editable.

  • What the card networks require

    What the rule requires. Visa and Mastercard impose their own adult-content rules on any business that wants to accept cards: documented consent for every person depicted, age verification, content provenance, and takedown response times. A processor that finds those missing does not fine you, it drops you.

    What is done about it. So these controls are not a later compliance pass bolted onto a working product — they are the reason the product is being built in this order. The consent model shipped before the storefront did, and payments are the last thing to be attached rather than the first.

This is a description of obligations the platform is built to meet and of choices made in response to them. It is not legal advice, and nothing here is a legal opinion about your situation — get your own, and take a copy of any release away with you before you sign it.

What you keep

One number matters and it is not buried: you take 50% — the largest single share of what a member spends, larger than the platform's own.

Fees come off the top

Your 50% is 50% of what is left after processing, not 50% of a larger number that gets whittled down afterwards. Every share carries the fee proportionally, including the platform's — and stating it this way round is the honest version, because processing on adult payments is expensive.

What that looks like

On $100 of generations, at a 15% processing rate, you receive $43. That is 50% after fees, and it is the figure the payout code produces rather than one written into this sentence. The rate is an illustration — the real one depends on a processor that is not attached yet.

Or take some of it up front

You can elect to take part of what your campaign raises as cash in your hand — per diem and walking money for the trip — rather than leaving it in the production. Every $100 you take costs 0.5 points of your share, so a small draw costs a small amount and the most anyone can take — $2,000 — is the full 10 points, leaving you at 40%. Take nothing and you stay at 50%.

How much is available is not a fixed figure. It is whatever your campaign raises, minus what the shoot actually costs on your dates and with the trip you picked, minus a contingency the production is not allowed to spend. So it is larger on a bigger raise, on cheaper dates and with a leaner trip; smaller on a tight campaign; and on expensive dates there is none — because the alternative is a shoot that runs out of money halfway through. Your figure is shown to you before you decide.

Subject to Loralicious approval, and subject to change depending on what your consent settings allow — a narrower scope produces less to earn from, so the advance is not offered on every scope. It is offered case by case, never claimed automatically, and the terms you are shown in writing before you sign are the terms that bind.

Broader consent pays more, but never changes your cut

Consent breadth moves your payout level; it does not shrink your percentage. Keeping those two things apart is deliberate — otherwise “permit more” quietly turns into “accept less of it”. The exact multipliers are not settled, so this page cannot quote them, and it is not going to invent one to look finished.

Backing a shoot is not buying you

Money raised on a pitch page funds one thing: a professional studio session, so your model is built from lit, directed capture. It is production financing. It grants a backer no rights over your likeness, no say in what gets made, and cannot widen your consent by a single line.

What is still open

Four questions without settled answers. They are published rather than hidden because you can check a project against its own admissions, and you cannot check a façade against anything.

What happens to media already generated if you withdraw consent?
New generations stop immediately and that part is enforced today. Recall of what already exists is unresolved, and it is the most legally significant gap on the list.
What exactly does broader consent pay?
The payout tiers are named — four of them — but the multipliers behind them are not set. The code refuses to return a number rather than guessing one.
What happens if a funding goal is missed?
Refund, hold, or convert is not decided. Taking money toward a shoot that may not happen is the riskiest part of the whole model, and it will be written down before any button turns on.
Who processes the payments?
Undecided, and it depends on a legal entity that does not exist yet. Until then no card details are collected anywhere.

If you want to see the flow without committing to anything

The application walkthrough asks you every question a real intake would, shows you your grant read back the way the system reads it, and stores nothing — no account, no upload, no draft on a server. There is nothing at the end of it to sign, because the release document does not exist yet.

Walk the consent flowSee an example pitch page